Buhari on naira devaluation debate
THE naira devaluation debate
resonated at the Presidential Villa with President Muhammadu Buhari
displaying his trademark rigidity at a meeting with members of the
Council of Retired Federal Permanent Secretaries. He told them that he
was not yet convinced of the benefits such an action would bequeath to
Nigeria given that previous efforts never impacted positively on the
economy.
Yet, the economy is crumbling.
At the parallel market, a dollar exchanges at N320, a rate very few
businesses could survive with. Already, large-scale job losses have
spread in many sectors as a result of low crude prices, forex shortage
and budget delay. According to the President, Manufacturers Association
of Nigeria, Frank Jacobs, 200 major companies risk closure due to the
scarcity of forex for raw materials procurement.
Essentially, a country
undertakes currency devaluation to boost export or make its goods
cheaper, thereby earning more foreign exchange; shrink trade deficit;
and reduce its sovereign debt burden. China, the second largest economy
in the world, trod this path last year when it devalued its yuan –
knocking off 3.5 per cent of its value to the US dollar – and thus
boosting exports. There is also a strong evidence of a sharp increase in
the inflow of capital following devaluation. But large currency
devaluations can hurt, too, by raising the price of imports and spurring
inflation.
But why is Buhari spurning the
devaluation of the naira? With hindsight, he told his guests that he
staunched the International Monetary Fund and World Bank requests to
devalue the currency and remove oil subsidy in 1985, but these were done
as soon as he was removed from office as a military Head of State.
Cynically, he enquired, “But how many factories were built and how many
jobs were created by devaluation?” He enjoys support from the likes of
Emeka Anyaoku, a former Secretary-General of the Commonwealth.
However, the President’s logic
is faulty. That Nigeria never gained from devaluations of the past does
not necessarily mean that a subsequent policy move in this direction
will beget a disastrous outcome. What may be wrong, however, with such
an undertaking now is the fact that our economic fundamentals are very
weak. Currency pegs allow nations to keep inflation and export prices
stable. But, what do we export apart from crude oil?
Truth is, hard choices still lie
ahead. The shortage of dollars for international business, which has
arisen from a steep decline in the global prices of crude oil —
Nigeria’s major foreign exchange earner — has triggered the alarm bells.
In response, the Federal Government introduced a slew of currency
restrictions to protect the naira, which include a fixed exchange rate
of N197-N199 to a dollar, limiting dollar sales at the foreign exchange
market and barring 41 items from the official forex market, among
others.
But the intended results have
not been achieved just yet. Instead, what is obvious is that the economy
is haemorrhaging; and inflation has hit 12.8 per cent on annualised
basis, the highest since July 2012. To be fair, the present dire
economic situation is not the fault of Buhari’s government. The Goodluck
Jonathan administration left us with a thoroughly plundered treasury
and an economy on the ropes.
Some experts have, therefore,
argued that the only viable option for the economy is to allow the naira
to float freely against the dollar and other major currencies; and by
devaluing, the gap between the official and parallel market will be
closed. Walter Lamberson, writing in the New York Times,
said, “Buhari’s insistence on maintaining the peg at the current
official exchange rate is not only crippling production, it is also
encouraging corruption. He should abandon it as soon as possible and
allow the naira to devalue.” He has a point.
Even some of our own experts,
including a former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Mohammed
Sanusi II, support devaluation. At the Monetary Policy Committee meeting
of the CBN in January, Doyin Salami, a Lagos Business School scholar,
also voted in favour, stressing the imperative to widen the midpoint of
the currency band to N220-$1, from the current N197. But he was a lone
voice out of the 12-member MPC.
Really, there is no easy way
out. Currency devaluation is one of the most dramatic — even traumatic —
measures of economic policy that a government may undertake. For any
country with weak economic fundamentals and without a war chest of
reserves, any option is difficult. Having a fiscal adjustment is
difficult and having exchange rate depreciation is difficult.
For Nigeria, will the falling
oil prices not be too much for our lean foreign reserves to bear? If
Saudi Arabia can stick to its promise to use vast foreign exchange
reserves (valued at $592.6 billion as at February 2016) to defend the
riyal’s 30-year-old peg to the US dollar, can Nigeria do that with a
paltry $27 billion in fiscal buffers? With a small manufacturing base
and almost all goods coming in as dollar-priced imports, it is argued, a
cheaper naira would instantly make Nigerians much poorer without
providing any benefit to the wider economy via cheaper exports.
Nigeria is not alone in this
quagmire; all developing and weak economies are. The economies of other
oil commodity traders such as Brazil, Malaysia, Russia and Colombia are
facing raps, forcing them to undertake varying degrees of devaluation or
depegging of their currencies and adoption of other policy drives to
head off economic headwinds.
Yet, Nigeria has a unique
economic structure. Our fear is that an economy with a weak export base
and serious infrastructure gap such as Nigeria’s might be cutting its
nose to spite its face if devaluation is done in isolation. Contrary to
expectation, a devaluation that is not accompanied with other
structural economic reforms would potentially further depress economic
activity.
And the way out? The IMF has
just warned again that oil exporters are facing another year of heavily
reduced oil export revenues, and require ongoing fiscal consolidation
and reforms to cope with these losses and to diversify their economies
away from oil. We believe that considerable attention should be paid to
Nigeria’s peculiar economic environment before a decision to devalue our
currency is made. Richard N. Cooper, Department of Economics, Princeton
University, US, argues in a paper, Currency Devaluation in Developing Countries
(1971), “Because of the associated trauma…, currency devaluation has
come to be regarded as a measure of last resort, with countless partial
substitutes adopted before devaluation is finally undertaken.”
What Nigeria urgently needs is a
structural reform that will, among others, tame public corruption, open
up and diversify the economy, roll back public investment in business,
end importation of refined petroleum products, improve ease of doing
business, unleash foreign direct investment in railway and power sectors
and substantially reduce our food import bills. If Buhari is against
devaluation, then he should roll up his sleeves and change his sluggish,
laid back approach to economic management.
No comments:
Post a Comment